Okay listen, I’m not saying you’re a liar. I’m really not. But at the same time, for two people to have this exact same original thought independently of each other… … that’s honestly hard to believe. So what you’re saying is that both you and a separate person both saw a photo of an orange Oscar the Grouch, and both came up with a joke about him spray painting himself and calling himself Agent Orange to mock Vietnamese people? Not only did you both imply that he became orange by specifically “spray-painting” himself as opposed to just “painting” or “dying” or simply “turning” orange, but you both used the phrase “his fur” instead of just “himself”, and you both added that it was specifically to offend Vietnamese people as opposed to just ending the joke at him calling himself Agent Orange. And on top of all of that, the wording of both are extremely similar:

Original:

Oscar spray paints his fur orange and goes around calling himself “Agent Orange” to mock the Vietnamese visitors.

Yours:

“Oscar spray paints his fur orange and goes around **town** calling himself ‘Agent Orange’ to mock ~~the~~ Vietnamese ~~visitors~~ tourists.”

Look how similar they are in sentence structure. You basically added the word “town”, used single instead of double quotes around “Agent Orange”, didn’t use the word “the” in front of “Vietnamese” and use the word “tourists” instead of “visitors”. Everything else is exactly the same.

I’m sorry but I’m just not buying it. Yep, that’s right. It’s me. The bertstrips police. Hands behind your back, pal. You’re under arrest.