Ok, time to lay this all out. This is gay geometry. First off straight is a straight line. No surprises there. And gay is an apeirogon. An apeirogon is a shape that looks exactly like a circle but is actually a shape that has a countably infinite (or ℵ0, if you will) number of sides that are also completely flat when we zoom in. Which actually makes it one dimensional but also not straight. Just remember, sides=same attraction. The more sides something has, the more homo it is. Next we move on to bi. Bi is a circle. Why? Well to describe something that is full homo we need an infinite number of sides (Like a circle or apeirogon). But bi is only half homo (yes ik that’s a stereotype but it’s the only thing that will work mathematically) so we would need half ∞. But the thing is half of ∞ is also ∞. Let me use a famous though experiment to explain. Imagine a hotel with a countably infinite number of rooms. Now imagine that the hotel is fully booked. Now imagine someone comes along and asks for a room. He can’t get one, every room is filled right? Well no. All Mr. Hotel Guy has to do (his name is Hilbert btw) is move the guy in room 1 to room 2 and the guy in room 2 to room 3 and so on. Then after doing that to infinity, he’ll have a free room. This illustrates how ∞ + 1 = ∞ still. This is true for any operation performed on infinity, no matter what it is. So ∞ / 2 = ∞ still. So what does this have to do with bi being a circle? Since something that is gay has an infinite number of sides. Something that is half gay (aka bi) therefore needs half the sides. But because ∞ / 2 = ∞ it’s still an infinite number of sides. Which means mathematically any amount of gay is infinitely gay. Anyways, the reason it’s a circle is because it’s the only 2 dimensional shape with infinites sides? Why does it need to be 2 dimensional? Well, in the system I’ve created, I use a number n dimensions to describe a mathematical relationship between n genders. So now onto pansexuals. Pansexuals technically describe attraction to an infinite amount of genders, since gender doesn’t matter to a pansexual, and there a theoretically infinite amount of possible genders. Therefore a shape describing a pansexual would be an ∞-dimensional polytope that’s infinitely detailed. I invented it, it’s called a pantope, now give me a prize. If you’re having trouble constructing such a shape try using a supertask. Why detail though? Well, earlier I was relating sides to same gender attraction but sides only really work in 1 to 2 dimensions. Once you get beyond that you don’t have sides. Bigger dimensions have multiple things on their shapes (Like 3 dimensions has faces and edges), so they’re all being lumped into a larger group called detail. Since we’re talking about ∞-dimension we’re talking about infinitely much detail though already. But if detail = same attraction, wouldn’t pan be detailed like once since only 1 of those genders is the same is theirs. Well just like with bi, ∞ tells us it doesn’t matter. Just like how ∞ / 2 = ∞, ∞ / ∞-1 = ∞ as well. Now for asexuals. Technically asexuals are attracted to no genders (not counting romantic attraction, that’s where shit gets complicated). Meaning that using the rule we established earlier (I use a number n dimensions to describe a mathematical relationship between n genders). So using this rule asexuals would be a 0th dimensional shape, and there’s one of those. It’s called the point (yeah, i’m getting to it). So asexuals are a point. The end, for now.

TL;DR: straight=line, gay=apeirogon, bi=circle, pan=∞-dimensional polytope and asexual=point