I have filed many complaints against your channel and contrary to what you imply it is not against conspiracy theory at all that I have been working together with quite a few others for your phasing out of YT. You are speaking about American history, quite competently I should admit, but the fact is that 1) You are not an entitled professor of history by any school in the world : your knowledge however accurate is that of an amateur not of someone who counts on his job of historian to survive or to help any government or private corporation survive. However accurate is your knowledge your are not entitled to impart it, in the same way so many pretend to be doctors in India and do cure some diseases but do so outside of any medical corporation : their knowledge is purloined. Whoever learns anything however accurate from a self-styled unauthorized teacher is a robber of that knowledge and is bound for a nasty karmic retribution. YouTube was originally meant for strictly leisurely activities first, it was specified among others that it should not serve for self-styled professionals or religious preachers pretending to religious authority. Later on the rules at YT were relaxed under the demand of various corporations and organizations, for instance in language teaching, but on the condition only approved organisms would be entitled to post. You cannot teach Esperanto without being approved of an Esperanto organisation such as TEJO because otherwise experience has proven that self styled Esperanto teachers teach their own idea about what Esperanto should be, not what it is, I file many complaints about false and unapproved Esperanto teachers, I file many complaints about teachers of Hinduism who have never met with one single Hindu Brahmin in their life, and many historians like you who have no mandate whatsoever : for your information the US is a corporation (among others : it is not only a corporation) and American history is the private property of the US Corp by International law. You have first to get some explicit authorization to teach US history Never forget that the First Amendment is as much and even more about defamation and false representation than about free speech, and that free speech is for whoever is qualified first as a gentleman to avail of free speech in the domains that are relevant to “his station and its duties”. You have absolutely no right to free speech in the domain of medicine if you are not a medical doctor by authorized vocation, and have absolutely no right to public free speech in the domain of religion if you are not acknowledged as a legitimate speaker of the religion in the name of which you preach. Am I not clear? I am combating cultural misappropriation : for instance you are not entitled to speak about black slavery if you are not a black descending from slaves or are not approved by any group of such blacks. I am also fighting knowledge misappropriation. The authors of the first amendment had in mind that someone not responsible enough to ensure his economic survival through the exertion of his right to free speech was not entitled to it. The Amendment excludes romantics and dilettantes as un American, as de facto traitors to the American work ethic. Catholics were once excluded from the amendment’s purview on account that they did not play the game (their intention is to let only their propaganda and make all other speech illegal) and that most Catholics were not economically responsible gentlemen having paid dear for their tuition and trying to survive.

2) In case you haven’t been informed the algorithmic analysis of your speech has repeatedly determined that your mental condition is unstable (you are pathologically depressive at percentile 98 with sure signs in your facial mimics testifying of physiological damage due to your condition) and the YT original regulation was to the effect that nobody suffering from any severe mental condition such as yours should film and post any video featuring his own person in speech or picture. Conspiracy theorists were banned right from the start if their psychiatric condition was determined to be physiologically paranoid (that translates into visible neurological and soft tissue damage) as is the case in more than 99% of instances. But paranoid schizophrenia is far from being the only mental illness extant. Depression is more prevalent and even more damaging, and like all real conformed mental illnesses, contagious. In India where I come from the topic has been addressed for millennia : when you are mentally sick, you take care of your own psyche, not of others’, and anybody who wants to purify the world or inform the world rather than himself is sick and unworthy of any free speech except as regards his own personal right to a good cure and spiritual teacher for his own case. I succeeded in having ousted Stephan Molyneux invoking the 2004 regulation of YT not because of conspiracy theory but of depression : his videos have probably caused about a dozen of suicides according to actuaries and I was proven right in my demand (in which I was far, far from being alone). Your video production is rife with a similar mental hazard. Informing people about topics with accurate information but so as to cause sure fire depression to whomever listens and understands is a perversion worse than pornography. And whenever I listen to Molyneux or you I feel drained of energy. Most people who post videos having that effect do so on purpose to drain their audience of energy and grab it in the hope of converting it into money. That proved to be the case with Molyneux, the guy has become a multi millionaire by impoverishing his audience through calculatedly induced depression robbing everyone of potential revenue. I hope that you are a nicer guy and are not a cynic in that vulgar sense of the word but only in the nobler Athenian sense ofthe word. I am also militating for all blues singers to be banned from YT because they are ALL by the very definition of their art, experts only in the art of putting everyone around into depression so as to turn the energy robbed into money